|Whoops, wrong couple.|
But as we know, for every story a person has to tell, there's at least 1 other person who has a more better story, but with lasers and free buffets, in this case, God. This response piece might as well be called "Marriage Isn't For You: It's for Christians trolololol" because the guy completely missed the point. Don't even get me started about his disabled comments section. Anyways, that nice Christian boy with the running shoes added his unwanted two cents, so I guess we can move on with our lives.
OR, mention the article in your own article, and then rehash the whole thing instead of just linking to the article. Bonus points if your article is fucking longer than the original. Better yet, how about writing a counter article and litter it with cat pictures and faulty logic, such as "Also, no one cares if you get married…" when this guy obviously does.The internet is littered with stories about the guy's post, everyone's personal response to what he had to say, what he had to say about what everyone else had to say, what the wife thought, and we're currently waiting to hear what Ja Rule thinks.
These "Response To" Articles are ridiculous. Whatever happened to the comments section? A simple "your wrong, lbs" would have been sufficient. "Response to" Article Writers are like beefing rappers, with more desire for street cred and less witty synonyms (nailed it!). They are agenda wielding brow beating attention whores who's sole purpose on the internet is to spread the word on shit nobody cares about. For every article out there, there are 3 articles of people patting the author on the back, 4 articles about how they only slightly disagree with the original author, and 2 articles telling the author to go fuck themselves. That marriage article itself made such a huge splash on the internet that it caused massive tidal waves in Second Life.
|Even Virtual Japan is not safe.|
Now and to sit patiently and wait for someone to make a "Response To" article to this blog.
Fuck you guys :(